Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

College students doubled their turnout for a midterm in '18

Camryn Kubicki

Drake University's Camryn Kubicki was among the 40 percent of college students who voted in 2018.

Joshua Lott/Getty Images

College students turned out at the polls in droves for the 2018 election, more than doubling their voting rate from the midterm contest four years prior.

The share of collegiate Americans who cast ballots in last year's midterm was 40.3 percent, a surge of 21 percentage points from 2014, researchers at Tufts University reported Thursday.

The report provides more good news for those worried the civic engagement of younger people has atrophied, and that those with the most schooling are not as politically active as they once were. (The study is also heartening for Democrats, because the young and well-educated are key components of their base.)


But the turnout boost by college kids was only marginally better than for young people generally. About 36 percent of all voters 18 to 29 went to the polls in 2018, up 16 points from four years before.

Turnout in midterms almost always lags the numbers in presidential years. But the study found college student turnout in 2018 was only 11 points below what is was in 2016, when President Trump defeated Hillary Clinton.

Of the students studied, women voted more than men, black women had the highest voter turnout of any student group (58 percent) and Hispanic women saw the highest jump in voting rates (up 16 points).

The study "marks a watershed election year for student voter turnout, including promising progress in narrowing some persistent turnout gaps," said Nancy Thomas, director of the Institute for Democracy & Higher Education at Tufts' Tisch College of Civic Life. "College students today are more diverse than ever, and while they are not a monolithic group, they represent a formidable voting bloc of nearly 20 million."

The study looked at the political participation patterns of about half of them, at 1,050 campuses nationwide.

Read More

Why Doing Immigration the “White Way” Is Wrong

A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

Why Doing Immigration the “White Way” Is Wrong

The president is granting refugee status to white South Africans. Meanwhile, he is issuing travel bans, unsure about his duty to uphold due process, fighting birthright citizenship, and backing massive human rights breaches against people of color, including deporting citizens and people authorized to be here.

The administration’s escalating immigration enforcement—marked by “fast-track” deportations or disappearances without due process—signal a dangerous leveling-up of aggressive anti-immigration policies and authoritarian tactics. In the face of the immigration chaos that we are now in, we could—and should—turn our efforts toward making immigration policies less racist, more efficient, and more humane because America’s promise is built on freedom and democracy, not terror. As social scientists, we know that in America, thinking people can and should “just get documented” ignores the very real and large barriers embedded in our systems.

Keep ReadingShow less
Insider trading in Washington, DC

U.S. senators and representatives with access to non-public information are permitted to buy and sell individual stocks. It’s not just unethical; it sends the message that the game is rigged.

Getty Images, Greggory DiSalvo

Insider Trading: If CEOs Can’t Do It, Why Can Congress?

Ivan Boesky. Martha Stewart. Jeffrey Skilling.

Each became infamous for using privileged, non-public information to profit unfairly from the stock market. They were prosecuted. They served time. Because insider trading is a crime that threatens public trust and distorts free markets.

Keep ReadingShow less
Supreme Court Changes the Game on Federal Environmental Reviews

A pump jack seen in a southeast New Mexico oilfield.

Getty Images, Daniel A. Leifheit

Supreme Court Changes the Game on Federal Environmental Reviews

Getting federal approval for permits to build bridges, wind farms, highways and other major infrastructure projects has long been a complicated and time-consuming process. Despite growing calls from both parties for Congress and federal agencies to reform that process, there had been few significant revisions – until now.

In one fell swoop, the U.S. Supreme Court has changed a big part of the game.

Keep ReadingShow less